$12 Billion in Switzerland: What Iran and the U.S. Actually Agreed, and Where the Dispute Starts

Gillian Tett

Iran and the United States confirmed Monday that $12 billion in frozen Iranian assets would be released as an immediate outcome of the memorandum of understanding signed in Switzerland. Parliamentary speaker and chief negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf described the measure as a direct consequence of Article 11 of the MoU. The full 14-point draft MoU called for $24 billion over the 60-day negotiating period, half before talks begin. YourDailyAnalysis lays out why the gap between the $12 billion announced and the $24 billion anticipated matters for how the deal will actually unfold.

The U.S. position on the money is materially different from Iran’s. Senior U.S. officials pushed back almost immediately, describing the arrangement as a pay-for-performance deal in which no frozen funds will be released without Iranian compliance. That is not the same as releasing $12 billion before talks begin. One side is announcing a financial transfer. The other side is denying any transfer happens before Iranian compliance. Both framings cannot be simultaneously true. The 60-day negotiating process will determine which one proves accurate.

Iranian frozen or restricted assets abroad are estimated at between $100 billion and $120 billion, accumulated across decades of sanctions. The $6 billion transferred from South Korea to Qatar in 2023 as part of a prisoner swap remained largely inaccessible after the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack. The $12 billion under discussion is believed to come primarily from Iranian funds held in foreign financial institutions including Qatar. YourDailyAnalysis traces the political context: each prior release of Iranian assets has been contested domestically in the U.S. as capitulation, and this one will face the same scrutiny.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance described a process in which White House envoy Jared Kushner had devised an arrangement where the U.S. and Qatar would retain control over Iranian funds when unfrozen, directing the money toward purchases of American agricultural goods. Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei responded: Tehran would spend its funds as it sees fit.

The oil export sanctions waiver is arguably more economically significant than the asset release. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi confirmed that Tehran secured waivers for crude oil exports and petrochemical products. Washington issued a 60-day waiver allowing Iran to sell oil and related products. Iran’s crude loadings had fallen from approximately 1.7 million barrels per day in early 2026 to below 0.3 million by May. Even partial restoration generates more near-term revenue than the frozen asset release.

Former U.S. Ambassador Henry Ensher said developments in shipping traffic suggested implementation of the agreement may already be underway. The ADNOC loading notice to Gulf buyers, the first LNG tanker crossing of the Strait of Hormuz, and the oil price decline from above $90 toward $80 per barrel all suggest that commercial actors are pricing in normalization ahead of formal verification. YourDailyAnalysis ranks the oil waiver as the operationally more important financial provision in the deal, with the $12 billion announcement functioning primarily as the headline markets and domestic audiences could price.

The 60-day negotiating window is the governing timeline for everything financial. If talks produce a binding final deal, the full $24 billion asset release, additional sanctions relief, and the $300 billion reconstruction financing mechanism all become live obligations. If talks collapse over nuclear material, ballistic missiles, or Lebanon, the 60-day oil waiver expires and no further financial transfers occur.

The agricultural goods dimension reflects a broader Trump administration pattern of attaching commercial benefits to diplomatic agreements. Whether Iranian funds purchase American corn, soybeans, and wheat is less a foreign policy question than a domestic political one: it gives the White House a concrete benefit to present to farm-state voters.

The signing ceremony resolved the political optic; the financial mechanism remains in active negotiation. Your Daily Analysis closes on the key date: whatever day the 60-day clock ends in August 2026 will tell the market whether the asset release was a down payment on a real deal or a figure both sides cited for domestic audiences while the hard work remained undone.

Share This Article