Bitcoin Heads For Worst Month Since 2022 Amid Global Risk Jitters

Gillian Tett

Bitcoin remains pinned near the lower boundary of its recent trading range, even as broader global markets show tentative signs of renewed risk appetite. That divergence is notable. While equities attempt stabilization, the crypto market continues to price caution. Within the framework applied by YourDailyAnalysis, this behavior signals that digital assets are still being treated as high-beta risk instruments rather than defensive allocations.

The token briefly fell toward the $62,500 level before recovering part of the decline, yet it remains down roughly 24% for the month – positioning February as the steepest monthly drop since mid-2022. Back then, the collapse of TerraUSD triggered a cascade of institutional failures that reshaped crypto’s leverage landscape. Today’s drawdown differs structurally, but the psychological memory of that period amplifies investor sensitivity to downside momentum.

Macro conditions remain the dominant catalyst. The announcement of a 15% global tariff framework in the United States unsettled risk assets broadly, reinforcing capital rotation toward traditional safe havens. Despite persistent narratives framing Bitcoin as “digital gold,” it continues to correlate more closely with growth equities during stress episodes. As our analysts emphasize in YourDailyAnalysis, Bitcoin’s long-term hedge thesis operates on a structural horizon, whereas short-term flows are driven by liquidity cycles and risk sentiment.

ETF flows provide an additional signal. U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs have recorded meaningful outflows in recent sessions, while options markets show elevated demand for downside protection relative to bullish positioning. Such flow dynamics often exert greater influence than headline price moves. When institutional vehicles turn net sellers, rallies tend to encounter supply pressure. According to observations regularly highlighted in Your Daily Analysis, sustainable recoveries typically require stabilization in ETF flows before technical breakouts can hold.

Technically, the $60,000 region represents a critical support band. The market is also approaching the 200-week moving average near the high-$50,000 range – a long-term indicator that historically has acted as structural support during deep corrections. The interaction between price and this zone may determine the next phase. Holding above it could produce a consolidation pattern; a decisive break below may open the path toward deeper retracement levels driven by mechanical liquidation and algorithmic repositioning.

Broader crypto capitalization has also contracted meaningfully in recent sessions, and Ether has mirrored Bitcoin’s weakness. This confirms that the move is systemic rather than asset-specific. During such phases, intra-crypto diversification offers limited protection as correlations rise sharply.

Three near-term scenarios dominate. In a stabilization scenario, ETF outflows moderate, and price holds above the $58,000–$60,000 corridor, allowing volatility to compress. In a bearish extension, continued macro pressure and defensive derivatives positioning could force a break below structural support. In a constructive recovery scenario, easing tariff rhetoric or improved liquidity conditions would likely be necessary to shift sentiment meaningfully.

From a strategic standpoint, this phase resembles a liquidity recalibration rather than a credit-driven collapse. There is currently no evidence of widespread systemic insolvency comparable to 2022. Nevertheless, momentum remains fragile. As emphasized in YourDailyAnalysis, monitoring ETF flows, options skew, and price behavior around the 200-week average offers more actionable insight than reacting to isolated intraday swings.

The coming weeks will clarify whether Bitcoin’s current range represents accumulation under stress or a staging ground for further downside. In volatile macro environments, the distinction often depends less on crypto-specific headlines and more on the direction of global liquidity and investor risk tolerance.

Share This Article
Leave a Comment